Blog Details

Plight of origin Security Secretary Kristi Noem says that Americans must ask future pure disasters to be handled within the same way to per chance the most standard deadly flooding in Texas—and no, she wasn’t being ironic. 

At some level of a press conference in Nashville, Tennessee, Thursday, Noem became once in denial about appropriate how badly she’d managed the Federal Emergency Administration Company’s response to flooding in Texas earlier this month. 

“What you noticed happen in Texas became once a long way more how FEMA will discover within the long slump. It obtained’t discover love the response to [Hurricane] Katrina, or the response to even [Hurricane] Helene, and what came about in North Carolina, where other folks waited weeks and weeks and months and months for attend,” she acknowledged.  

But Noem had severely botched FEMA’s Texas response by failing to resume contracts with corporations staffing FEMA call centers, ensuing in a majority of calls going unanswered for days as the flood waters raged. The secretary disregarded the reporting as “faux info.”

Noem moreover reportedly delayed FEMA’s initial response by instituting a policy that required her to individually stamp off on all DHS expenditures exceeding $100,000. FEMA officers, who were ignorant of the brand new rule, didn’t accumulate Noem’s lunge-forward for 72 hours. 

Closing month, Donald Trump acknowledged he plans to “share out” FEMA after this yr’s hurricane season, and future disbursements would near straight from him. “We’re going to give it out straight. It’ll be from the president’s place of job. We’ll accept as true with someone here, will be space of origin security,” Trump acknowledged at the time. Clearly, striking Noem guilty of individually approving choices in a trouble comes at a rate, and the Trump administration’s mismanagement of reduction is more a long way-reaching than appropriate the flooding in Texas. 

Twenty Democratic-led states sued the Trump administration Wednesday, claiming that the White Home had acted illegally when cancelling FEMA’s Constructing Resilient Infrastructure and Communities grant program, which funds infrastructure projects equivalent to levees, shelters, and seismic testing to provide protection to other folks towards low weather. 

Basically the most radical component about Elon Musk this month is his staggering unpopularity.

Public idea of the realm’s richest man fell by 66 ingredients since his foray into politics, in conserving with a CNN ballot launched Thursday.

Musk became once the most current person in conserving with a Bloomberg ballotin June 2016—but almost a pair of decade later, his ratings accept as true with tanked. This month, appropriate 23 percent of those polled considered Musk favorably, with 60 percent having an corrupt idea of him, making accumulate favorable idea of the conservative tech -37 ingredients, CNN reported. Principal of that has came about staunch thru the last four months, for the length of which his favorability ratings with the GOP accept as true with sunk by 55 ingredients.

His sagging numbers accept as true with affected the viability of Musk’s third celebration dreams: Americans document that whereas they desire a third celebration as a exchange to Democrats and Republicans, they decidedly attain no longer desire one began by Musk. Loyal 22 percent of voters basically liked a Musk-whisk third celebration, whereas 74 percent opposed it, in conserving with CNN.

Other most standard experiences came upon identical outcomes. A YouGov ballot launched Monday came upon that whereas almost about half of surveyed Americans—Forty five percent—felt that a profitable third celebration became once imperative for the country, appropriate 11 percent of those polled acknowledged they’d give a clutch to Musk’s.

While Americans accept as true with lengthy complained of crimson tape and crash at the upper echelons of the federal executive, they didn’t devour the metaphorical “chainsaw” that Musk’s DOGE took to federal companies and their services. Americans especially didn’t love Musk’s involvement, a Unique York Events evaluate of plenty of surveys reported in April.

Musk’s space in American politics has change into particularly tenuous since he publicly severed ties with Donald Trump final month, attempting (and failing) to assassinate the president’s “colossal, handsome bill” and accusing the president of being eager with runt one intercourse trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Despite Musk threatening to significant all Republicans who supported the funds bill, he became once unable to sway a single vote.

Donald Trump is already lying about why CBS’s The Late State With Stephen Colbert became once canceled. 

“I fully love that Colbert’ got fired. His abilities became once even less than his ratings,” Trump wrote on Fact Social Friday morning. “I hear Jimmy Kimmel is subsequent. Has even less abilities than Colbert! Greg Gutfeld is greater than all of them mixed, in conjunction with the Moron on NBC who ruined the once colossal Tonight State.”

However the decision clearly had nothing to attain with ratings. 

Within the 2nd quarter of 2025, Late State averaged 2.42 million viewers across 41 first-whisk episodes, in conserving with Late Nighter, summoning a greater viewership than opponents in that time slot, in conjunction with ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel Live! and NBC’s The Tonight State Starring Jimmy Fallon. Meanwhile, Fox News’s Gutfeld did surpass Colbert for the length of its earlier time slot, with an moderate viewership of three.29 million other folks. But when eager with the host’s penchant for racist and antisemitic drivel, there isn’t mighty to idolize there.  

Colbert’s cancellation came appropriate days after the host called out Paramount, CBS’s guardian company, for agreeing to pay $16 million to the Trump administration to resolve a lawsuit over an edited 60 Minutes interview of failed Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris. It’s price noting that Fox News has fully shredded taped interviews with the president in a desperate strive to set him sound well-liked. 

At some level of his monologue, Colbert argued that Paramount knew the lawsuit became once “entirely without advantage” but agreed to pay a “colossal beefy bribe” to ease its sale to Skydance Media—a deal that wants approval from the president.

Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren took to social media Thursday evening to defend Colbert. “CBS canceled Colbert’s order appropriate THREE DAYS after Colbert called out CBS guardian company Paramount for its $16M settlement with Trump—a deal that appears to be like love bribery,” she wrote on X. “America deserves to know if his order became once canceled for political causes.”

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders moreover backed up the unhurried evening host. “CBS’s billionaire owners pay Trump $16 million to resolve a bogus lawsuit whereas looking to promote the community to Skydance. Stephen Colbert, an unparalleled abilities and the most current unhurried evening host, slams the deal. Days later, he’s fired. Stop I own it’s a long way a accident? NO,” he wrote on X. 

Fellow unhurried evening host Jimmy Kimmel, who became once name-dropped in Trump’s rant, defended Colbert. “Treasure you Stephen. Fuck you and your total Sheldons CBS,” Kimmel wrote in a post on Instagram. 

After going thru extensive stress from his nasty, Donald Trump has ordered the Justice Division to initiate additional dinky print pertaining to runt one intercourse trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. The providing became once, it appears to be like, good sufficient to construct up a piece of a long way-lawful influencers back on his side.

By Friday morning, conservatives on X were abuzz, looking to construct up any reason to brush off a Wall Facet road Journal document that Trump allegedly penned a salacious letter to Epstein more than two decades ago for the financier’s fiftieth birthday.

Self-described “theocratic fascist” Matt Walsh wrote on X that the letter, which became once reportedly requested by Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, “screams faux.”

“The writing doesn’t sound love Trump at all,” Walsh claimed. Hours earlier, Walsh had insisted that Trump’s efforts to shed his Epstein-conscious nasty by deriding them as “weaklings” and as “dumb” and “naive” became once the “quantity 1 way to be sure that I keep talking concerning the topic.”

Laura Loomer, who earlier this month had called on Trump to throw his attorney well-liked out of the manager for her role within the reprised scandal, became once within the same way busy defending the president by Friday morning.

“I’m calling bullshit on this Trump ‘birthday letter’ to Epstein. It’s completely faux. Every person who basically KNOWS President Trump knows he doesn’t form letters. He writes notes in colossal sad Sharpie,” Loomer insisted. “Believe me, I would know.”

The Journal reported that the drawing of a nude lady that framed Trump’s letter became once accomplished in Sharpie. His signature on the rate, which became once scrawled between the girl’s legs and resembled pubic hair, became once moreover accomplished in Sharpie.

And Elon Musk, who it seems to be that accused Trump of delaying the initiate of the Epstein recordsdata on the foundation that the MAGA leader became once implicated in them, elevated a script from his AI chatbot Grok that claimed the Journal reporting became once “per chance faux.” Grok cited Trump’s “sturdy denial” of the memoir and his threat to sue the newspaper and its proprietor Rupert Murdoch over the letter’s publication.

But no longer all people on the lawful became once sold by Trump’s meager providing.

“Closing week, the Dept of Justice claimed the Epstein Files don’t exist but they’re moreover a Democrat hoax, and there is nothing in them excluding runt one intercourse abuse cloth,” wrote white supremacist, Hitler fan, and a long way-lawful political pundit Nick Fuentes. “Now the DOJ, below public stress, goes to united states of americaa. colossal jury testimony? Not procuring it.”

On Thursday, Fuentes completely mocked Trump as “beefy,” “a joke,” “dumb,” and “no longer silly,” and acknowledged that “the liberals were lawful” and that the country would “discover back at MAGA inch as the easiest scam in historical previous.”

Donald Trump and JD Vance clearly didn’t clutch the time to construct up their memoir straight concerning the president’s lewd fiftieth birthday letter to alleged intercourse trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

The Wall Facet road Journal reported Thursday that in 2003, Trump penned Epstein a “bawdy” rate interior of a doodle of a voluptuous lady as share of a e book of birthday notes for the financier. The president wrote that he had “sure issues in well-liked” with the runt one intercourse offender, and wished his “pal” that “day after day is also a marvelous secret.”

Trump and his crew leapt to discredit the reporting—but unfortunately, they didn’t all jump the identical way.

Vance took to X to defend Trump, claiming that the president’s crew hadn’t even laid eyes on the letter earlier than it became once printed.

“Forgive my language but this memoir is total and voice bullshit. The WSJ needs to be ashamed for publishing it,” Vance wrote. “The set is that this letter? Would you be vastly bowled over to learn they by no methodology confirmed it to us earlier than publishing it? Does anybody if truth be told imagine this sounds love Donald Trump?”

“Doesn’t it violate some rule of journalistic ethics to post a letter love this without showing it to the victim of this hit allotment?” Vance wrote in a separate post. “Will the folk which accept as true with sold into each and each hoax towards President Trump order an oz. of skepticism earlier than procuring into this unparalleled memoir?”

But Trump went a assorted route, claiming that he’d individually warned the publication that he’d sue them if they printed the “faux, malicious, and defamatory” memoir.

“The Wall Facet road Journal, and Rupert Murdoch, individually, were warned straight by President Donald J. Trump that the supposed letter they printed by President Trump to Epstein became once FAKE and, if they print it, they are going to be sued,” Trump wrote in a post on Fact Social.

So which became once it? Was the Trump administration entirely blindsided by the publication of the letter, or did Trump accumulate sufficient near warning to individually threaten them with a lawsuit if they printed it? And why lunge to such lengths to forestall publication if the letter is so clearly faux?

This most standard controversy comes amid a firestorm for the Trump administration, as the MAGA horde accept as true with demanded more transparency on the so-called Epstein recordsdata, after the Justice Division printed a memo claiming that the intercourse felony kept no incriminating client list. Trump’s attorney well-liked had beforehand claimed to accept as true with that very list sitting on her desk. The mishap has Trump so completely backed staunch into a corner that he’s begun claiming that the so-called Epstein recordsdata are a hoax created by Democrats, and seething at his supporters for caring concerning the recordsdata at all.

It’s price noting that Vance’s criticism that the letter doesn’t “sound” love Trump falls entirely flat. Despite the total lot, the rate came appropriate one yr after Trump became once quoted in a 2002 Unique York Journal profile of Epstein, calling him a “terrific guy.”

“He’s exchange fun to be with. It is a long way even acknowledged that he likes handsome girls folks as mighty as I attain, and plenty of them are on the younger side. No question about it—Jeffrey enjoys his social existence,” Trump acknowledged at the time.

Trump’s attorney later claimed that the 2 had “no relationship.”